Fourth & Inches

2026 regular · wk 4 · half ppr · 64 games lined

QB

Brock Purdy

SF

QB14 · overall #109 · tier 4 · age 26

← back to rankings

Projected points

220

16.5/gm

Value over replacement

12

repl 250

Range

179–261

sd 41

Week

22.0

vs DEN

The take

written by hand

I raised him to QB7 from QB19 and he lands QB3 on value. He finished QB23 last year, so be honest about what this is — a bet on the situation, not on what he has done.

Why this ranking

hand-set 2026-08-22

GAMES ONLY, corrected 22 Aug. An earlier version of this row today also claimed a RATE of 18.30/g, and that claim was WRONG and is withdrawn. It argued the model credited him with only 86% of San Francisco's pass plays while Bo Nix took essentially all of Denver's. That compared pass ATTEMPTS against pass PLAYS, which are different things -- plays include sacks and scrambles. Measured over 95 team-seasons 2023-25, a team's primary quarterback throws a MEDIAN 0.808 of his team's pass plays, p90 0.878, and Purdy's own realised seasons were 0.808 and 0.799. His 0.865 was ABOVE the median and near the 90th percentile, and his projected 28.36 attempts sat on his career 29.57. There was no dilution and nothing to fix. WHAT SURVIVES IS THE GAMES, which is independent of that error. The model had 12.6, the largest haircut of any startable quarterback, off ONE injury-shortened season; his own outlook line already flagged it, and the measurement behind the flag is that QB availability explains just 9% of next-year availability. 13.3 is his own 2023-25 record, 40 of 51 (16, 15, 9) -- his actual durability rather than his worst year. THE RATE IS LEFT NATIVE at the model's 15.90. It does sit 3.82 below his own decay-weighted 19.72, the largest negative in the QB group, and that is worth understanding -- but traced, it is ordinary regression of his EFFICIENCY, not a volume bug: his yards per attempt has fallen 9.64, 8.49, 7.63 across three seasons and the model lands 7.65, right on his most recent. Whether it over-regresses a passer's efficiency is a real question and is NOT settled here, so no number is invented for it.

This is a view, not a correction — the model said something different and was overruled. See how it works.

Projected usage

opportunity, before efficiency

Pass attempts / game
29.6
Pass yards / game
226
Pass TD / game
1.59
Carries / game
3.5
Rush yards / game
14
Rush TD / game
0.22
Games projected
13.3
Observed pts/gm (history)
17.9
Games of history
49
Age multiplier
1.038
Usage carryover
1.00

Team context

what scales this projection

Neutral sec / play
35.5
Projected plays / game
59.5
Projected pass rate
56%
OL run block
-0.01
OL pass protection
-0.56
OL continuity
78%
2TE rate
17%
3WR rate
45%
1st-down pass rate
46%
Run friendly
+0.64
Scheme creativity
+0.36
Play action / motion
23% / 70%

Situation

ambiguity widens the projection range

Label
settled
Ambiguity score
24
Effective contributors
–
Top player's share
–
New play-caller
no
Variance multiplier
1.34

Trade window

schedule-driven buy / sell timing

Action
hold
Window weeks
4-6
Window opponents
DEN,SEA,WAS
Window matchup
-0.19
Opponents after
ATL,LV
After matchup
-0.01
Flip edge
-0.18
Buy basis
recent form
Bye week
8
Playoff schedule (15-17)
-1.02

2025 game log

full season · Standard

Games

9

Points

177.4

Per game

19.71

17-gm pace

335

Best / worst

36.9 / 5.2

Pace extrapolates the selected weeks over 17 games. It is what that stretch was worth, not a projection — no availability, matchup or regression adjustment is applied.

WkPtsRankCmpAttPa YdsPa TDINTRu AttRu YdsRu TD
116.8QB162635277225170
417.7QB152238309222130
1119.3QB61926200301-70
127.3QB242332193136160
1317.1QB13162916810241
1526.2QB42330295307440
1630.9QB22534295512110
1736.9QB12433303316282
185.2QB281927127012210