Fourth & Inches

2026 regular · wk 4 · half ppr · 64 games lined

WR

Alec Pierce

IND

WR38 · overall #93 · tier 8 · age 26

← back to rankings

Projected points

129

8.8/gm

Value over replacement

20

repl 119

Range

94–164

sd 35

Week

0.0

@ WAS

Why this ranking

hand-set 2026-09-04

Raised 123.8 -> 129.0 (WR44 -> WR38), the one genuine finding from triaging the audit's 46 market disagreements. A RATE CLAIM -- fantasy_points only; his 14.7 games carry no designation now that the August PUP has resolved, and are not in dispute. THE DECAY BLEND IS DRAGGING A RISING PLAYER BACK, which is the Blake Corum instrument at receiver. His half-PPR seasons run 5.74, 4.67, 8.93, 10.65 -- a clear ascent -- and USAGE_DECAY_BY_POS['WR'] of 0.50 blends a career that no longer describes him. The model lands 8.42/g, BELOW BOTH of his last two seasons. His targets are treated sanely (5.26 against 4.31 and 5.60); it is the scoring rate the blend holds down. EVERY OUTSIDE SOURCE IS ABOVE US, which is unusual for a player with no injury and no role question: ADP WR31, consensus WR34, ECR WR40, Underdog WR44, and Sleeper projects 150.9 -- 10.27/g, essentially his 2025 rate. He is Indianapolis's depth-1 receiver on the highest WR snap share on the team, 0.843. GAMES PINNED AT 14.7, THE MODEL'S OWN, and that was the second try. Written as a bare total the raise went entirely to GAMES -- 14.7 to 15.3, rate unmoved at 8.43, so he did not move a rank -- because his availability carries damping and split_override gives games first claim on undoing it. Wrong factor: the argument is that his SCORING RATE is held down by a career blend, not that he plays more. 129.0 over a pinned 14.7 is 8.77/g, which is STILL BELOW his 2024 of 8.93 and a long way under his 2025 of 10.65. So this concedes the least defensible part of the gap rather than matching anyone: it lands WR38, inside the market's own spread of 31 to 44 and below the middle of it. It should help the dynasty board too, where we are low on him for the same reason -- 136 against a market median of 90 -- without needing a dynasty row of its own.

This is a view, not a correction — the model said something different and was overruled. See how it works.

Projected usage

opportunity over the projected season

Targets
80
Carries
2
Receptions
45
Rec yards
775
Rush yards
10
Rush TD
0.0
Rec TD
5.0
Total TD
5.0
Games projected
14.7
Observed pts/gm (history)
10.3
Games of history
64
Age multiplier
1.009
Usage carryover
1.00

Team context

what scales this projection

Neutral sec / play
32.7
Projected plays / game
61.8
Projected pass rate
57%
OL run block
+0.69
OL pass protection
+0.76
OL continuity
81%
2TE rate
35%
3WR rate
65%
1st-down pass rate
48%
Run friendly
+0.12
Scheme creativity
+0.53
Play action / motion
31% / 50%

Situation

ambiguity widens the projection range

Label
committee
Ambiguity score
75
Effective contributors
3.54
Top player's share
36%
New play-caller
no
Variance multiplier
1.85

Trade window

schedule-driven buy / sell timing

Action
buy now, flip wk7
Window weeks
4-6
Window opponents
WAS,PIT,TEN
Window matchup
+0.69
Opponents after
MIN,JAX,DAL
After matchup
+0.26
Flip edge
+0.43
Buy basis
recent form
Bye week
13
Playoff schedule (15-17)
+0.35

2025 game log

full season · Standard

Games

15

Points

136.3

Per game

9.09

17-gm pace

154

Best / worst

25.2 / 0.0

Pace extrapolates the selected weeks over 17 games. It is what that stretch was worth, not a projection — no availability, matchup or regression adjustment is applied.

WkPtsRankTgtRecRe YdsRe TDAttRu Yds
13.6WR553136000
26.8WR475468000
36.7WR365467000
64.8WR404248000
79.8WR2010598000
86.9WR345269000
911.5WR16136115000
1014.4WR127484100
122.6WR582126000
1313.8WR135478100
148.0WR258580000
151.6WR851116000
1620.6WR34486200
170.0WR120500000
1825.2WR274132200